Co-Regulation 2:3
OUTLINE
Lesson 3: What Regulation Really Is
1. Defining Regulation
Regulation as a general concept: maintaining balance (thermostat analogy)
In this course: regulation = energy and arousal in the nervous system
Siegel's framing: regulation is the accelerator and brakes of energy/arousal staying in balance
2. The Autonomic Nervous System (ANS): Accelerator and Brake
Lives in the brainstem, the lowest and earliest-developing part of the brain
-
Two branches (simplified model):
Sympathetic = accelerator (adds energy)
Parasympathetic = brake (decreases energy)
Sympathetic takes us up: stress, surprise, excitement
Parasympathetic takes us down: rest, calm, social engagement
3. Clearing Up Misconceptions
-
Sympathetic arousal is NOT automatically fight/flight
It becomes fight/flight only when neuroception detects danger cues ("not safe")
-
Parasympathetic energy is simply the brake
The parasympathetic emergency brake (collapse) activates with cues of life threat, not just danger
Collapse pulls energy from limbs toward torso/head to protect survival
Freeze: contested in ANS models; this course places it under sympathetic
4. The Window of Tolerance (WOT)
A regulated ANS has natural rises and falls between sympathetic and parasympathetic energy
WOT = the space where we can manage those ups and downs without "freaking out"
Regulation isn't about being calm or happy, it's about being in balance (can include anger)- "appropriate energy level to match the situation"
Popularized by Siegel and Porges; often called the "just right" or "Goldilocks" zone
Multiple factors widen or narrow a person's WOT
5. How Regulation Develops: The Attachment Cycle
Basic cycle: need arises, need is expressed, caregiver approaches and soothes, both return to rest
Infant's sympathetic branch is well-developed at birth (can cry/express intensity immediately)
Infant's parasympathetic branch is underdeveloped (can't self-soothe)
-
Caregiver's role:
Caregiver's own sympathetic burst on hearing the cry drives them to respond (infant feels seen/matched)
Caregiver then engages their own parasympathetic brake to become a calm, soothing presence
Infant "borrows" regulation from the caregiver's parasympathetic branch
Repeated ~"1 billion" times in year one: this patterns in regulation as the foundation of ANS development
6. You Don't Have to Get It Right All the Time
Common worry: fixating on missed cues and "messing up" the child
Ed Tronick's research: even highly attuned parents match their baby's needs only ~30% of the time
100% attunement isn't necessary and wouldn't even be beneficial
Applies across ages: babies, kids, partners, all humans
7. The Neuroscience: Myelination
Neuron/axon basics: messages travel down the axon
At birth, parasympathetic signals travel slowly/inefficiently
Co-regulation builds myelin (insulation) around the axon, like insulation on a wire
More myelin = faster, cleaner signal = stronger, more efficient parasympathetic brake = regulation
-
Ventral vagus (parasympathetic brake) sees peak myelination growth between 30โ32 weeks gestation and ~6 months postpartum
Helps explain how in-utero and early infancy experiences shape kids
-
Important caveat: this is not the only window for myelin growth
The brain can grow and change across the lifespan
Older kids, ourselves, and partners can all strengthen the parasympathetic brake
Chronic sympathetic arousal (chronic stress/activation) impairs myelin growth and decreases regulation
RKBBB's core focus: strengthening the parasympathetic brake via felt safety, connection, and co-regulation
8. Co-Regulation Across the Lifespan
Co-regulation drives myelin development in infancy and beyond
Co-regulation is a requirement for regulation, not just an infancy stage
Addresses common parent pushback: fear that this approach is "coddling" or reinforces bad behaviour, and the pull back toward punishments/consequences
Strengthened regulatory circuits let kids rest more in "connection mode"
Connection mode enables skill development, access to prior skills, problem-solving, and decision-making
-
Self-regulation = internalized co-regulation
Develops through repeated experiences of co-regulation, internalized over time
Not taught through "calm down skills"
9. Case Example: The Dance Recital Video
Scenario: a distressed child holding her teacher's hand, body collapsed, thinking brain offline
Teacher is attuned but stretched across many kids
Dad enters, calibrates distance, then physically connects
Result: immediate settling, thinking brain comes back online, she remembers her dance moves, posture and connection with peers return
Discussion
โค๏ธ The dance-dad video often provokes mixed reactions. What comes up for you after watching it?
๐งก Addressing "why her and not other kids": all nervous systems develop at different rates with different needs; her needs are as valid as any other child's
๐ What are some of my child's behaviors that don't LOOK or feel dysregulated to me, but also are not demonstrating a desire for connection?
๐ Are there any limiting beliefs that come up when I consider reframing those behaviors as behaviors of protection?
๐ฉต What behaviours does my child demonstrate that are telling me they are in need of soothing/coregulation but are hard for me to respond with co-regulation?
๐ What is getting in the way of me responding with soothing/coregulation?